Formoterol monotherapy compared with combined ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Citation
M. Konermann et al., Formoterol monotherapy compared with combined ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CLIN DRUG I, 21(4), 2001, pp. 235-242
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
ISSN journal
11732563 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
235 - 242
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(2001)21:4<235:FMCWCI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of formoterol (12 or 2 4 mug twice daily) alone with combined ipratropium bromide and fenoterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Design and Setting: Randomised, parallel-group, open-label study in 10 Germ an centres. Patients: 101 patients with COPD. Interventions: The patients were randomised to receive either formoterol 12 mug twice daily or a combination of ipratropium bromide 20 mug plus fenote rol 50 mug three times daily for 4 weeks. Dosages could be doubled if requi red. Results: Morning pre-dose airway resistance (R-eff) decreased significantly from 0.87 to 0.66 kPa .L-1.s with formoterol and from 0.81 to 0.66 kPa .L- 1.s with combined ipratropium bromide and fenoterol (p = ns). The treatment groups were similar with respect to other lung function parameters, daily clinical symptom scores and salbutamol rescue medication. Adverse events oc curred in 7/52 (13.5%) of the formoterol and 11/49 (22.4%) of the combinati on therapy group, and were the reason for study discontinuation in one(1.9% ) versus seven (14.3%) patients. The overall discontinuation rate was 5.8% (3/52) with formoterol and 20.4% (10/49) with ipratropium bromide/fenoterol (p = 0.038). Conclusions: The efficacy of formoterol monotherapy was comparable with tha t of combined ipratropium bromide and fenoterol in the treatment of COPD. F ormoterol had a better adverse event profile and a lower rate of discontinu ations resulting from adverse events.