M. Konermann et al., Formoterol monotherapy compared with combined ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CLIN DRUG I, 21(4), 2001, pp. 235-242
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of formoterol (12 or 2
4 mug twice daily) alone with combined ipratropium bromide and fenoterol in
the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Design and Setting: Randomised, parallel-group, open-label study in 10 Germ
an centres.
Patients: 101 patients with COPD.
Interventions: The patients were randomised to receive either formoterol 12
mug twice daily or a combination of ipratropium bromide 20 mug plus fenote
rol 50 mug three times daily for 4 weeks. Dosages could be doubled if requi
red.
Results: Morning pre-dose airway resistance (R-eff) decreased significantly
from 0.87 to 0.66 kPa .L-1.s with formoterol and from 0.81 to 0.66 kPa .L-
1.s with combined ipratropium bromide and fenoterol (p = ns). The treatment
groups were similar with respect to other lung function parameters, daily
clinical symptom scores and salbutamol rescue medication. Adverse events oc
curred in 7/52 (13.5%) of the formoterol and 11/49 (22.4%) of the combinati
on therapy group, and were the reason for study discontinuation in one(1.9%
) versus seven (14.3%) patients. The overall discontinuation rate was 5.8%
(3/52) with formoterol and 20.4% (10/49) with ipratropium bromide/fenoterol
(p = 0.038).
Conclusions: The efficacy of formoterol monotherapy was comparable with tha
t of combined ipratropium bromide and fenoterol in the treatment of COPD. F
ormoterol had a better adverse event profile and a lower rate of discontinu
ations resulting from adverse events.