Few countries in recent decades have experienced economic growth as rapid a
s that in Brazil. The period spanning the late 1960s and mid 1970s, during
which GDP growth was especially strong, is often referred to as the 'econom
ic miracle'. Yet, the use of per capita GDP growth as a proxy for economic
development (or social welfare improvement) can be questioned on both distr
ibutional and environmental grounds. Scholars such as Ahluwalia and Chenery
have noted that per capita GDP growth places greater weight on the income
of richer income groups, and have proposed distribution-neutral and pro-poo
r alternatives. More recently, studies by the World Resources Institute and
others have questioned the environmental sustainability of GDP growth and
have introduced an alternative national income accounting methodology that
factors in estimated losses associated with natural resource depletion. To
date, no studies have undertaken both types of revisions concurrently, crea
ting a revised national welfare measure based on per capita GDP, but correc
ted for both distributional bias and resource depletion. Such a measure is
derived in this article and applied to the Brazilian case. The results cast
doubt on the proposition that rapid economic growth in Brazil has resulted
in comparable welfare gains.