R. Mathur et al., Postprandial improvement of gastric dysrhythmias in patients with type II diabetes - Identification of responders and nonresponders, DIG DIS SCI, 46(4), 2001, pp. 705-712
Using the technique known as electrogastrography, we studied the postprandi
al response of gastric myoelectrial activity in subjects with type II diabe
tes. Seventy-one subjects with type II diabetes underwent 1 hr of fasting e
lectrogastrography recording. HbAlc and fasting serum glucose levels were o
btained, Subjects then underwent an additional 2 hr of electrogastrography
recording in the post prandial state. Sixty of the 71 patients (85%) had ga
stric rhythm abnormalities in the fasting state. Forty-six of 71 subjects (
65%) responded to the test meal by improving their electrogastrography trac
ings (responders) while 35% did not respond (nonresponders), The time spent
in bradygastria during the fasting state by responders was 26.3 +/- 12.8%
vs 10.9 +/- 8.5% for nonresponders (P < 0.0001). The percent tachygastria d
uring the fasting state in responders was 19.8 <plus/minus> 13.0%, which wa
s less than nonresponders (38.3 +/- 29.7%) (P < 0,001), Fasting plasma gluc
ose and HbAlc could not be used to predict the gastric myoelectrical respon
se to meal. In conclusion, gastric rhythm disturbances are common in type I
I diabetes; there was no correlation between HbAlc levels, age, duration of
diabetes, or fasting serum glucose and gastric dysrhythmia in response to
meal, two groups of subjects emerged: those who became less dysrhythmic in
the post pradial state (responders) and those who did not (non-responders);
and fasting bradygastria was associated with responders and fasting tachyg
astria was associated with nonresponders.