Herbivore physiological state affects foraging trade-off decisions betweennutrient intake and parasite avoidance

Citation
Mr. Hutchings et al., Herbivore physiological state affects foraging trade-off decisions betweennutrient intake and parasite avoidance, ECOLOGY, 82(4), 2001, pp. 1138-1150
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00129658 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1138 - 1150
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-9658(200104)82:4<1138:HPSAFT>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The trade-offs between nutrient and parasite intake for herbivores foraging in nutrient-poor systems are poorly understood. We tested whether a trade- off exists between the benefit of increased nutrient intake rate through gr azing relatively tall swards and risks of parasitism in a grazing situation for sheep. The effect of level of feeding motivation and parasitic status on the grazing behavior of sheep faced with this trade-off was also investi gated. Animals were presented with pairs of experimental swards (36 X 21 cm ) that varied in height (12 cm = H+; 6 cm = H-) and level of contamination with feces from sheep infected with Ostertagia circumcincta (20 g feces per sward = FS; no feces = F-) and were allowed to graze for short periods. Ex periment 1 presented four choices (H+F+ vs. H-F-; H+F+ vs. H-FS; H+F- vs. H -F-; H+F- vs. H-F+) repeated three times to 24 5-mo-old sheep divided into four animal treatment groups resulting from two levels of feeding motivatio n (high and moderate) and two parasitic states (parasitized and nonparasiti zed). Experiment 2 presented the above four choices three times each to 24 12-mo-old sheep in four animal treatment groups created from two parasitic states (parasitized and nonparasitized) and two immune states (immune and n aive to O. circumcincta). All animals selected 12-cm swards over 6-cm sward s in both experiments. In all choices except the trade-off choice, in both experiments, one award held a clear height or feces benefit (absence of fec es) that was selected for by all treatments. When presented with the trade- off choice (H+F+ vs. H-F-), animals with a high feeding motivation selected the H+F+ sward more than moderately motivated animals did in Experiment 1. Immune animals selected the H+F+ sward more than naive animals did in Expe riment 2. Subclinical parasitism in moderately feeding-motivated animals re sulted in increased avoidance of feces and reduced grazing depths, thereby reducing further risk of parasitism in Experiment 1. This effect of parasit ism was not repeated in the older animals of Experiment 2, where all animal s maintained a high-parasite-risk grazing strategy by selecting the H+F+ aw ard of the trade-off choice. However, parasitized animals in Experiment 2 r educed parasite intake and, therefore, the risks associated with grazing th e H-I-FS sward by significantly reducing their grazing depth compared to al l other treatment groups. Sheep grazing decisions involving forage intake a nd feces avoidance were affected by their feeding motivation, immune state, and parasitic state. Strong avoidance of feces-contaminated pasture can be overcome by the attraction of herbivores to tall swards. Trade-off framewo rks are able to predict diet selection and grazing behavior, are useful whe n investigating host-parasite interactions, and may enhance the predictive powers of optimal foraging models.