Background and Study Aims: Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecyst
ectomy (LC), numerous articles have been written emphasising its many advan
tages over open cholecystectomy (OC). However, reports also highlight incre
ased complications following LC such as bile-duct, vascular and bowel injur
ies. We aimed to study surgical trainees as a defined population of individ
uals who, with increasing exposure to cholecystectomy, would become fully a
ware of LC's advantages and controversies. We wished to test the hypothesis
that, with increasing in-depth knowledge, they might opt for OC rather tha
n LC if they themselves required cholecystectomy.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a postal survey of all 133 Northern Ire
land surgical trainees identified as having exposure to LC during their tra
ining. Trainees were asked whether they would undergo LC and if so with whi
ch preconditions. Similarly, if they stated a preference for open cholecyst
ectomy they were asked to state the reason. A minimum time period of 18 mon
ths was considered adequate for trainees to become relatively more experien
ced with their more junior counterparts.
Results: A response rate of 80.5% (107/133) was achieved. A total of 51 of
107 trainees had at least 18 months' experience, Of the 107 who replied, 88
.8% (95/107) would be willing to undergo LC. A total of 12 of 107 trainees
would opt for OC, with twice as many experienced trainees (8 vs. 4) opting
for this approach (n.s. [not significant]), Significantly more experienced
trainees cited the use of laparoscopic cholangiography as a precondition fo
r LC compared with their inexperienced counterparts (7 vs. 1, p = 0.020). O
f 107 trainees, 19 would request use of the open first port (Hasson) techni
que; 14 of these had at least 18 months' experience (p = 0.009). Conclusion
: Our survey confirms that the majority of trainees would be willing to und
ergo LC. However, increased experience of LC may alter an individual's expe
ctations about how LC should ideally be performed.