Selection to maximize electroreceptive search area might have driven evolut
ion of the cephalofoil head morphology of hammerhead sharks (family Sphyrni
dae). The enhanced electrosensory hypothesis predicts that the wider head o
f sphyrnid sharks necessitates a greater number of electrosensory pores to
maintain a comparable pore density. Although gross head morphology clearly
differs between sphyrnid sharks and their closest relatives the carcharhini
ds, a quantitative examination is lacking. Head morphology and the distribu
tion of electrosensory pores were compared between a carcharhinid, Carcharh
inus plumbeus, and two sphyrnid sharks, Sphyrna lewini and S. tiburo. Both
sphyrnids had greater head widths than the carcharhinid, although head surf
ace area and volume did not differ between the three species. The raked hea
d morphology of neonatal S. lewini pups, presumably an adaptation to facili
tate parturition, becomes orthogonal to the body axis immediately post-part
urition whereas this change is much less dramatic for the other two species
. The general pattern of electrosensory pore distribution on the head is co
nserved across species despite the differences in gross head morphology. Sp
hyrna lewini has a mean of 3067 +/- 158.9 SD pores, S. tiburo has a mean of
2028 +/- 96.6 SD pores and C. plumbeus has a mean of 2317 +/- 126.3 SD por
es and the number of pores remains constant with age. Sphyrnids have a grea
ter number of pores on the ventral surface of the head whereas C. plumbeus
has an even distribution on dorsal and ventral surfaces. The greater number
of pores distributed on a similar surface area provides S. lewini pups wit
h a higher density of electrosensory pores per unit area compared to C. plu
mbeus pups. The greater number of ampullae, the higher pore density and the
larger sampling area of the head combine to provide hammerhead sharks with
a morphologically enhanced electroreceptive capability compared to compara
bly sized carcharhinids.