In the confrontation which invests me with a radical responsibility, the fa
ce of the other escapes all representation, it defies any phenomenological
description according to Levinas. It is beyond experience-an "abstraction."
Could the face of my neighbour be said impossible to figure, its proximity
being best described as an approach, an ethical relation? Any representati
on, any thematisation of the face would actually disfigure it and would pre
vent the approach. "The mode in which the face shows its own absence under
my responsibility, requires a kind of description, which can only be ethica
l." It is this "strange" and "unknown" language which the present article s
tudies on the basis of the constant and friendly dialogue which Maurice Bla
nchot and Emmanuel Levinas had together, in margins of their respective wor
ks.