Objective: To find out if the presence of a sternal fracture indicates card
iac and aortic injuries and to clarify the difference between a retrosterna
l haematoma and widened mediastinum.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Teaching hospital. Sweden.
Subjects: 418 patients with blunt chest trauma of whom 29 had a fractured s
ternum (11 with retrosternal haematoma and 18 without) and 389 did not (7 w
ith widened mediastinum and 382 without). Main outcome measures: Definition
s, risk factors, morbidity, and mortality.
Results. Retrosternal haematomas were found adjacent to many fractures and
ranged in size from a few mm to 2 cm. They were more common in fractures of
the body of sternum. There was no significant difference in the number of
associated lesions between patients with sternal fractures with or without
a retrosternal haematoma. Conversely, patients with a widened mediastinum h
ad a higher injury severity score, longer hospital stay (p < 0.0001), and m
ore associated lesions (p < 0.05) than those with retrosternal haematomas.
Six patients still had pain 1 month after injury of whom two had injury-rel
ated long-term disability because of pain. No serious cardiac or aortic inj
uries were detected in this series. The early mortality in our study was 2/
29 in patients with sternal fractures and 1/7 in patients with widened medi
astinum.
Conclusions: Sternal fractures are more common than previously reported. An
aggressive approach including early operative reduction is recommended eve
n for a stable fracture to reduce the overhelming pain. Sternal fracture wi
th or without retrosternal heamatoma is not a reliable indicator of cardiac
and aortic injuries. while mediastinal widening is still a fairly reliable
clue that should indicate further investigation.