Objective: To reach an evidence-based consensus on the relative merits of v
ertical and transverse laparotomy incisions.
Design: Review of all published randomised controlled trials that compared
the postoperative complications after the two main types of abdominal incis
ions, vertical and transverse.
Setting: Teaching hospital, Denmark.
Subjects: Patients undergoing open abdominal operations.
Interventions: For some of the variables (burst abdomen and incisional hern
ia) it was considered adequate to include retrospective studies. Studies we
re identified through Medline, Cochrane library, Embase, and a manual searc
h of relevant journals. The references cited in these studies were reviewed
to find out whether any other trials fitted the selection criteria.
Main outcome measures: Early complications including postoperative pain, pu
lmonary complications, burst abdomen, wound infection, and hospital stay, a
nd late complications (incisional hernia).
Results: Eleven randomised controlled trials and seven retrospective studie
s were identified. The transverse incision offers as good an access to most
intra-abdominal structures as a vertical incision. The transverse incision
results in significantly less postoperative pain and fewer pulmonary compl
ications. Vertical laparotomy, however, is associated with shorter operatin
g time and better possibilities for extension of the incision. The pooled o
dds ratio for burst abdomen in the vertical incision group was 2.86 (95% co
nfidence interval 1.72 to 4.73, p = 0.0001), and regarding late incisional
hernia the pooled odds ratio was 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 2.57
, p = 0.02).
Conclusions: Transverse incisions in abdominal surgery are based on better
anatomical and physiological principles. They should be recommended, as the
early postoperative period is associated with fewer complications (pain, b
urst abdomen, and pulmonary morbidity) and there is lower incidence of late
incisional hernia after transverse compared with vertical laparotomy. A mi
dline incision is still the incision of choice in conditions that require r
apid intra-abdominal entry (such as trauma) or where the preoperative diagn
osis is uncertain, as it is quicker and can easily be extended.