Introduction: In order to be able to influence and monitor future developme
nts for urologists, strategies should be promoted in advance to guarantee t
he future of the speciality and to accommodate the inevitable changes. Face
d with this challenge, the EAU, through its Strategy Planning Office (SPO),
has prepared a document which is offered, here, in abbreviated form, to th
e European and international urological communities for general considerati
on.
Material and Methods: A group of subjects, related to the domains and inter
nal consistency of urology as a speciality, were selected and discussed amo
ng the members of the SPO and later submitted to open consultation among di
stinguished members of the urological community. The topics selected for di
scussion included: what is urology; urology in the university; sub-speciali
zation in urology; training in urology; does kidney transplantation belong
to urology, and others.
Results: It is shown that urology is going through an exciting and hazardou
s transition period. Urology has conflicting problems in its traditional do
mains due to changes in health care policy, and internal identification pro
blems due to its permanent expansion and sub-specialization options. Weaker
points are its relation with primary care medicine (shared care options),
the presence and role of urology in institutions such as the university, de
partment of surgery, children's hospitals, administration, etc.; the desegr
egating effect of the sub-specialities; the increasing encroachment of othe
r specialities, and the increasing outpatient effect of technological progr
ess.
Conclusion: An action plan is proposed to confront these changes without lo
osing manpower, internal consistency or social image and improving patient
care quality, excellence of training and scientific progress. Copyright (C)
2001 S. Karger AG. Basel.