Democracy's Discontent is part of an ongoing debate between liberals a
nd communitarians about the usefulness of liberal political theory as
a foundation for American law and public policy. Through analyses of b
oth court cases and texts of political theory, Professor Michael Sande
l criticizes both the philosophical assumptions upon which liberalism
is based and the political culture to which it has given rise in the U
nited States. The ideology of the procedural republic, based on an exa
ggerated individualism, has gained ascendancy over the ideology of civ
ic republicanism, which attends to the demands of community cohesion a
nd civic virtue, and now jeopardizes the vitality of American democrat
ic life. Professor Shanley argues that Sandel creates a false dichotom
y between the ideology of the procedural republic and that of civic re
publicanism. That dichotomous approach leads Sandel to a skewed readin
g of the history of American political thought and of certain Supreme
Court decisions. Shanley argues that ''rights talk'' has neither stemm
ed from nor produced the kind of exaggerated individualism that Sandel
claims, and contends that the distortions in Democracy's Discontent r
isk depriving us of useful tools in shaping policies beneficial to ind
ividuals and their communities alike.