Audit of HIV testing: who, why and when?

Citation
C. Thompson et H. Smith, Audit of HIV testing: who, why and when?, INT J STD A, 12(4), 2001, pp. 260-263
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS
ISSN journal
09564624 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
260 - 263
Database
ISI
SICI code
0956-4624(200104)12:4<260:AOHTWW>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The risk factors, referral pattern and presence/absence of genital tract sy mptoms and/or sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in 189 patients having HIV counselling and/or testing at genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics are reviewed. Eighty per cent were concerned about heterosexual transmission, 9.5% men who have sex with men (MSM) and 4.8% intravenous drug users (IDUs) . Heterosexuals and first-time GUM attenders were more likely to have sough t prior advice from their general practitioner (GP). The majority were asym ptomatic for genital tract infections, but 83% accepted an STI screen, with 44 STIs being diagnosed. Only one individual who had attended primarily fo r HIV screening was found to have an STI. About half of individuals present ed within the window period, and of those stating that they wished to proce ed with deferred testing, half subsequently failed to return, resulting in wasted health adviser appointments.