Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen qualityfollowing cryopreservation
Lm. Thurston et al., Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen qualityfollowing cryopreservation, J ANDROLOGY, 22(3), 2001, pp. 382-394
This study investigated two hypotheses: 1) that consistent between-boar var
iation in frozen semen quality exists and is genetically determined, and 2)
that morphologically distinct subpopulations of spermatozoa exist within f
resh boar ejaculates and that the incidence of these subpopulations is corr
elated with semen quality following cryopreservation. Five ejaculates were
collected from each of 15 boars (5 boars from each of 3 breeds). An objecti
ve sperm morphology analyzer used Fourier shape descriptors to describe var
iation in the morphology of 300 spermatozoa per ejaculate before freezing,
Semen was diluted into a commercial freezing buffer (700 mOsm/kg, 3% glycer
ol) and 5 straws (0.5 mL) per ejaculate were cryopreserved (to -5 degreesC
at 6 degreesC/min, then -5 degreesC to -80 degreesC at 40 degreesC/min). Se
men was assessed for percentage of motile cells and motility characteristic
s (with computer-aided sperm analysis), plasma membrane integrity (SYBR-14
positive), and acrosome integrity (fluorescein-labeled peanut agglutinin po
sitive). Consistent between-boar variability was detected for post-thaw spe
rm motility (P < .01), membrane integrity (P < .01), acrosome integrity (P
< .01), curvilinear velocity (P < .01), straight-line velocity (P < .05), b
eat cross-frequency (P < .05), and amplitude of lateral head displacement (
P < .01). Three morphologically distinct subpopulations of spermatozoal def
ined by Fourier descriptors, were detected, The proportion of these subpopu
lations within the fresh ejaculate correlated with semen quality assessment
s made following cryopreservation. These findings support the hypothesis th
at consistent interindividual variation in sperm freezability is geneticall
y determined and may relate to processes that occur during spermatogenesis,
Subsequent characterization of these genetic differences between "good" an
d "poor" freezers may ultimately identify biophysical components of the spe
rmatozoa that are essential for successful cryopreservation.