Mo. Sweeney et al., Provoked and spontaneous high-frequency, low-amplitude, respriophasic noise transients in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, J CARD ELEC, 12(4), 2001, pp. 402-410
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Introduction: Ventricular oversensing (OS) of respirophasic noise transient
s may cause spurious detections and therapies and pacing inhibition among p
atients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), The incidence
of OS and its relationship to clinical variables and ICD system design are
unknown,
Methods and Results: Three hundred twenty-nine patients performed provocati
ve respiratory maneuvers at rest during intrinsic rhythm and continuous ven
tricular pacing, OS resulting in spurious ventricular detections was provok
ed in 3 (0.9%) of 329 patients during intrinsic rhythm and 34 (10.3%) of 32
9 during pacing. Noise transients not recognized and marked as sensed event
s, but visually evident on the local endocardial ventricular electrogram, w
ere provoked in an additional 23 (7.0%) of 329 patients. Multivariate logis
tic regression identified history of spontaneous OS (P < 0.0005, odds ratio
9.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 50.0). automatic gain control dev
ice (P < 0.0005, odds ratio 5.3, 95% CI 2.6 to 10.8) or integrated bipolar
lead (P = 0.05, odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 7.25), and male gender (P = 0
.008, odds ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 11.1) as predictive of provocable OS. S
pontaneous OS resulting in spurious ventricular detections and therapies oc
curred in 12 (3.6%) patients during follow-up. Eleven of 12 spontaneous epi
sodes occurred in male patients during ventricular pacing; 11 of 12 patient
s had automatic gain control devices and integrated bipolar leads,
Conclusion: OS is commonly provoked in ICD patients during ventricular paci
ng and may occur spontaneously, causing spurious tachyarrhythmia therapies
and pacing inhibition, Differences in the incidence of spontaneous and prov
oked OS between ICD systems can be explained on the basis of unique feature
s of automatic sensing systems and sensing lead design.