The performance of chromatography data analysis software packages is of car
dinal importance when the precision and the accuracy of a chromatographic s
ystem are evaluated. Users cannot rely on a procedure generating chromatogr
aphic data of known accuracy. Holistic approaches cannot always be entirely
trusted. We propose a new method consisting in validating a data analysis
package against computer generated chromatograms of exactly known character
istics by feeding these chromatograms into the vendor supplied software and
comparing the results supplied by the software and the exact answers. We s
imulated symmetrical and tailing chromatograms and processed these signals
with the Agilent Technologies (formerly Hewlett-Packard) ChemStation softwa
re. The noise profile (i.e. the power spectrum of the baseline) was determi
ned for a HPLC UV detector Frier to the calculations, and chromatograms of
different signal-to-noise ratios were used for the analysis. For every chro
matogram, we simulated 25 replicates with identical signal-to-noise ratios
but different noise sequences. In this manner, both the random and the syst
ematic errors of the retention data and peak shape characteristics can be e
valuated. When analyzing tailing peaks, we simulated the effects of extra-c
olumn band broadening and those of column overload. Our calculations show t
hat the general performance of the data analysis system studied is excellen
t. The contribution of the random error originating from the data analysis
procedure is in most cases negligible compared to the repeatability of the
chromatographic measurement itself. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science BN. All right
s reserved.