Ch. Lindh et al., BIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF METHYLHEXAHYDROPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE BY DETERMINATION OF METHYLHEXAHYDROPHTHALIC ACID IN URINE AND PLASMA FROM EXPOSED WORKERS, International archives of occupational and environmental health, 70(2), 1997, pp. 128-132
Objective: To investigate whether methylhexahydrophthalic acid (MHHP a
cid) in urine and plasma can be used as a biomarker for exposure to me
thylhexahydrophthalic anhydride (MHHPA). Methods: MHHPA in air was sam
pled by Amberlite XAD-2 and analysed by gas chromatography (GC) with f
lame ionisation detection. MHHP acid in urine and plasma was analysed
by GC with mass spectrometric detection. Workers occupationally expose
d to MHHPA were studied. Air levels of MHHPA were determined by person
al sampling in the breathing zone. Urinary levels of MHHP acid, a meta
bolite of MHHPA, were determined in 27 workers. In eight workers all u
rine was collected at intervals during 24 h. Plasma levels of MHHP aci
d were determined in 20 workers. Results: The time-weighted average (T
WA) air levels ranged from 5 to 60 mu g MHHPA/m(3) during 8-h workshif
ts. The urinary levels of MHHP acid increased during exposure and deca
yed after the end of exposure with an estimated half-life of about 6 h
. A correlation was also found between the TWA air levels of MHHPA and
creatine-adjusted MHHP acid levels in urine collected during the last
4 h of exposure. A correlation was also seen between the TWA air leve
ls of MHHPA and the plasma concentrations of MHHP acid. An exposure to
20 mu g MHHPA/m(3) corresponded to about 140 nmol MHHP acid/mmol crea
tinine and about 40 nmol MHHP acid/l plasma. Conclusion: The results i
ndicate that MHHP acid in urine or plasma may be used for biological m
onitoring of the exposure to MHHPA.