The effect of phosphorus availability on the carbon economy of contrastingcommon bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes

Citation
Kl. Nielsen et al., The effect of phosphorus availability on the carbon economy of contrastingcommon bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes, J EXP BOT, 52(355), 2001, pp. 329-339
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
ISSN journal
00220957 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
355
Year of publication
2001
Pages
329 - 339
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0957(200102)52:355<329:TEOPAO>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
A common response to low phosphorus availability is increased relative biom ass allocation to roots. The resulting increase in root:shoot ratio presuma bly enhances phosphorus acquisition, but may also reduce growth rates by di verting carbon to the production of heterotrophic rather than photosyntheti c tissues. To assess the importance of increased carbon allocation to roots for the adaptation of plants to low P availability, carbon budgets were co nstructed for four common bean genotypes with contrasting adaptation to low phosphorus availability in the field ('phosphorus efficiency'). Solid-phas e-buffered silica sand provided low (1 muM), medium (10 muM), and high (30 muM) phosphorus availability. Compared to the high phosphorus treatment, pl ant growth was reduced by 20% by medium phosphorus availability and by more than 90% by low phosphorus availability. Low phosphorus plants utilized a significantly larger fraction of their daytime net carbon assimilation on r oot respiration (c, 40%) compared to medium and high phosphorus plants (c, 20%), No significant difference was found among genotypes in this respect. Genotypes also had similar rates of P absorption per unit root weight and p lant growth per unit of P absorbed, However, P-efficient genotypes allocate d a larger fraction of their biomass to root growth, especially under low P conditions. Efficient genotypes had lower rates of root respiration than i nefficient genotypes, which enabled them to maintain greater root biomass a llocation than inefficient genotypes without increasing overall root carbon costs.