More than 25% of women in the United States undergo hysterectomy by age 60.
In assessing the appropriateness of this procedure, physicians should cons
ider the surgical techniques available, the impact of ovary removal and the
subsequent induction of menopause, and the requirement of long-term estrog
en replacement. The option of ovarian preservation should also be explored.
When ovaries are healthy and viable, without malignancy, preservation may
be possible to ensure that the maximum natural hormonal benefits can be gai
ned by the patient, thus avoiding the immediate and sharp decline in hormon
e production created by surgical menopause. The long-term effects of loss o
f ovarian function - including impact on cardiovascular and bone health and
the immediate vasomotor symptoms and urogenital impact-are also problemati
c. The loss of androgens and estrogen, the physical and psychologic implica
tions, and the requirement of compliance with a hormone replacement regimen
over a longer period of time should be balanced carefully. In the gynecolo
gic profession, no consensus exists concerning the optimum method by which
to perform a hysterectomy in different situations. The method selected depe
nds more on the experience and biases of the surgeon than on a critical eva
luation of operative and outcome data. This paper reviews indications for h
ysterectomy, the advantages and disadvantages of various procedures, and th
e circumstances in which ovarian preservation is warranted. Options and var
ious procedures are discussed for treating such conditions as pelvic inflam
matory disease and tuboovarian abscess, chronic pelvic pain, cancer and res
idual ovary syndrome. Also discussed is the impact of various procedures on
patient well-being, cost, complications and the need for additional surger
y.