M. Bauer et al., Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: No difference in postoperative pulmonary function, J THOR SURG, 121(4), 2001, pp. 702-707
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objectives: Less-invasive approaches in cardiac operations offer certain co
smetic advantages, but it is unclear whether there are additional positive
effects with regard to the postoperative recovery of patients. The aim of t
his prospective and randomized study was to ascertain whether partial infer
ior midline sternotomy can improve pulmonary function, one of the best quan
tifiable parameters of postoperative recovery, after coronary artery bypass
operations when compared with the standard full midline approach.
Methods: One hundred patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass
grafting were randomized either for a full median sternotomy (standard ste
rnotomy group, n = 50) or for a partial inferior sternotomy (ministernotomy
group, n = 50). The following pulmonary features were assessed: vital capa
city, forced expiratory volume, percentage of forced expiratory volume from
vital capacity, total lung capacity, residual volume, maximum inspiratory
pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure. Tests were performed preoperativ
ely and on the fourth and tenth postoperative days.
Results: On the fourth postoperative day, both groups had a significant dec
rease in vital capacity (percentage of predicted values) when compared with
preoperative values (preoperative vs fourth day: standard sternotomy group
, 87.8% +/- 14.3% vs 42.1% +/- 10.2% [P < .0001]; ministernotomy group, 84.
5% <plus/minus> 14.3% vs 41.5% +/- 11.8% [P < .0001]), with a significant t
endency for recovery from the fourth to the tenth postoperative day (fourth
vs tenth postoperative day: standard sternotomy group, 42.1% <plus/minus>
10.2% vs 66.3% +/- 12.3% [P = .001]; ministernotomy group, 41.5% +/- 11.8%
vs 61.3% +/- 13.1 % [P = .002]). There were no differences in any test resu
lts between the groups on either the fourth or the tenth postoperative day.
Conclusion: A less-invasive approach for coronary artery bypass operations
with a partial inferior sternotomy does not improve early postoperative pul
monary function when compared with the conventional approach with a full st
ernotomy.