A. Alsheikh et al., Comparison of the WHO/ISUP classification and cytokeratin 20 expression inpredicting the behavior of low-grade papillary urothelial tumors, MOD PATHOL, 14(4), 2001, pp. 267-272
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
It has not been possible to identify those low-grade papillary transitional
cell. bladder tumors that will recur based on conventional histopathologic
assessment. Both the new World Health Organization/ International Society
of Urologic Pathology (WHO/ ISUP) classification. of transitional cell papi
llary neoplasms and the pattern of tumor cytokeratin 20 (CK20) immunostaini
ng have been suggested as means of improving prognostication in low-grade t
ransitional cell tumors. Forty-nine low-grade, noninvasive papillary transi
tional cell tumors were identified for the period between 1984 and 1993, Th
e recently described WHO/ISUP classification was applied, and the tumors we
re classified histologically as papilloma, papillary neoplasm of low malign
ant potential (LMP) or low-grade papillary carcinoma After CK20 immunostain
ing, the expression pattern in the tumor was classified as normal (superfic
ial) or abnormal. Of 49 tumors, 20 were classified as papillary neoplasms o
f LMP and five of these patients (25%) experienced a recurrence. Of 29 tumo
rs classified as low-grade papillary carcinoma, 14 (48.2%) recurred, In 46
of 49 cases, the CI(20 immunostaining could be evaluated. Sixteen tumors sh
owed normal (superficial) pattern of CK20 expression, and four (25%) of the
se patients experienced a recurrence. In contrast, of 30 patients with abno
rmal CK20 staining of their tumors, 15 (50%) patients had one or more recur
rences, In this study papillary neoplasms of LMP (as per the WHO/ ISUP clas
sification system) had a lower recurrence rate than low-grade papillary tra
nsitional cell carcinoma Similarly low-grade urothelial tumors showing a no
rmal CK20 expression pattern recurred less frequently than tumors with an a
bnormal pattern of CK20 staining. Neither of these differences was statisti
cally significant, and recurrences were observed in 20% of patients whose t
umors were both classified as papillary neoplasms of LMP and showed normal
CK20 immunostaining; thus they do not allow a change in our current managem
ent of patients with low-grade papillary urothelial tumors, with dose follo
w-up for all patients.