Gb. Shanno et al., Assessment of acutely unsuccessful attempts at detachable coiling in intracranial aneurysms, NEUROSURGER, 48(5), 2001, pp. 1066-1072
OBJECTIVE: Guglielmi detachable coiling (CDC) has quickly become the most c
ommon endovascular method for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Alth
ough several published case series describe various authors' successful exp
eriences or complications, few have elaborated on failed attempts. We exami
ned our experience with GDC, and we analyzed all failed attempts at coiling
.
METHODS: Patients who underwent endovascular procedures from September 1995
through July 1999 were identified using endovascular case logs and billing
records. Patient charts were then reviewed retrospectively for failed atte
mpts at GDC. A treatment failure was defined as an inability to place coils
into an aneurysm, a CDC procedure-related complication resulting in death,
or an acute rehemorrhage from a coiled aneurysm that indicated a failure o
f coils to prevent rerupture. Thromboembolic events and other nonfatal sour
ces of morbidity that did not preclude coiling of the aneurysm were analyze
d only to the extent that they prevented successful coiling of the aneurysm
.
RESULTS: From September 1995 to June 1999, 241 patients underwent CDC embol
izations or attempts. In these patients, 35 procedures were unsuccessful, i
ncluding 7 deaths from intraoperative or postoperative aneurysmal rerupture
. Sixteen aneurysms could not be microcatheterized, nine of which were ante
rior communicating artery aneurysms. Coils from 13 wide-necked aneurysms (a
verage fundus-to-neck ratio, <2) prolapsed into the parent vessel. Three pr
ocedures were abandoned when the aneurysms were found to have normal branch
es filling from the dome, and three additional procedures were abandoned fo
r technical reasons. Five deaths resulted from intraoperative aneurysm rupt
ure, and two patients died postoperatively from rerupture.
CONCLUSION: The number of successful coiling procedures has increased with
experience and improved technology. The procedure still involves risks, how
ever, primarily for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.