In 1997, 50 000 hip replacements will be performed in the UK, and over
I million worldwide. Venous thromboembolism is the most frequent seri
ous complication following joint replacement: its effective and econom
ic management is essential. Antithrombotic prophylaxis can be used to
reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolic disease, which presents
as either deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A number of publ
ished studies have shown that prophylaxis against venous thromboemboli
sm is financially beneficial in terms of reduced diagnostic and treatm
ent costs. Cost-effectiveness studies have provided a comparison of th
e costs and consequences resulting from alternative prophylactic progr
ammes.This article reviews the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism
after total hip replacement, prophylaxis against it and a model for co
st-effectiveness analysis. Its aim is to highlight inadequacies in the
available data and areas of uncertainty within the model that require
further research. Pharmacoeconomic studies published to date have all
used a similar framework to allow prophylactic options to be compared
. However, assumptions made about the frequency of clinical disease ha
ve varied widely between studies. This degree of uncertainty calls int
o question the validity of reported incremental cost savings between t
reatments, Some studies have also failed to address the cost of compli
cations resulting from the prophylactic method under consideration.Fut
ure studies must carefully consider the validity of their models, unde
rstand the limitations on current knowledge of outcome rates, and care
fully consider all outcomes (both beneficial and detrimental) that res
ult from the intervention.