An optimization method for importance factors and beam weights based on genetic algorithms for radiotherapy treatment planning
Citation
Xg. Wu et Yp. Zhu, An optimization method for importance factors and beam weights based on genetic algorithms for radiotherapy treatment planning, PHYS MED BI, 46(4), 2001, pp. 1085-1099
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
SICI code
0031-9155(200104)46:4<1085:AOMFIF>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
We propose a new method for selecting importance factors (for regions of in
terest like organs at risk) used to plan conformal radiotherapy. Importance
factors, also known as weighting factors or penalty factors, are essential
in determining the relative importance of multiple objectives or the penal
ty ratios of constraints incorporated into cost functions, especially in de
aling with dose optimization in radiotherapy treatment planning. Researcher
s usually choose importance factors on the basis of a trial-and-error proce
ss to reach a balance between all the objectives. In this study, we used a
genetic algorithm and adopted a real-number encoding method to represent bo
th beam weights and importance factors in each chromosome. The algorithm st
arts by optimizing the beam weights for a fixed number of iterations then m
odifying the importance factors for another fixed number of iterations. Dur
ing the first phase, the genetic operators, such as crossover and mutation,
are carried out only on beam weights, and importance factors for each chro
mosome are not changed or 'frozen'. In the second phase, the situation is r
eversed: the beam weights are 'frozen' and the importance factors are chang
ed after crossover and mutation. Through alternation of these two phases, b
oth beam weights and importance factors are adjusted according to a fitness
function that describes the conformity of dose distribution in planning ta
rget volume and dose-tolerance constraints in organs at risk. Those chromos
omes with better fitness are passed into the next generation, showing that
they have a better combination of beam weights and importance factors. Alth
ough the ranges of the importance factors should be set in advance by using
this algorithm, it is much more convenient than selecting specific numbers
for importance factors. Three clinical examples are presented and compared
with manual plans to verify this method. Three-dimensional standard displa
ys and dose-volume histograms are shown to demonstrate that this method is
feasible, automatic and convenient.