Background. In other branches of epidemiology, stratum specific likelihood
ratios (SSLRs) have been found to be preferable to fixed best threshold app
roaches to screening instruments. This paper presents SSLRs of GHQ-12 and G
HQ-28 and compares the SSLR method with the traditional optimal threshold a
pproach.
Methods. Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to obta
in pooled estimates of SSLRs of the two questionnaires for the 15 centres p
articipating in the WHO study of Psychological Problems in General Health C
are. We illustrated the use of SSLRs by applying them to random samples of
patients from centres with different backgrounds.
Results. For developed and urban centres, the estimates of SSLRs were homog
eneous for 10 out of 12 strata of the GHQ-12 and GHQ-28. For other centres,
the overall results, which were heterogeneous for six out of 12 strata. we
re deemed the currently available best estimates. When we applied these res
ults to centres with different prevalences of mental disorders and backgrou
nds, the estimates matched the actually observed closely. These examples sh
owed how the SSLR approach is more informative than the traditional thresho
ld approach.
Conclusions. Those working in developed urban settings can use the correspo
nding SSLRs with reasonable confidence. Those working in Iron-urban or deve
loping areas may wish to use the overall results, while acknowledging that
they must remain less certain until further research can explicate heteroge
neity. These SSLRs have been incorporated into nomograms and spreadsheet pr
ogrammes so that future researchers can swiftly derive the post-test probab
ility for a patient or a group of patients from a pre-test probability and
GHQ score.