Effects of transmyocardial revascularization on myocardial perfusion and systolic function assessed by nuclear and magnetic resonance imaging methods

Citation
L. Aaberge et al., Effects of transmyocardial revascularization on myocardial perfusion and systolic function assessed by nuclear and magnetic resonance imaging methods, SC CARDIOVA, 35(1), 2001, pp. 8-13
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL
ISSN journal
14017431 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
8 - 13
Database
ISI
SICI code
1401-7431(200102)35:1<8:EOTROM>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objective-There is no obvious explanation, except placebo, to the symptomat ic effect of transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) in patients with refractory angina. Whether TMR improves myocardial perfusion or relieves s ymptoms without altering cardiac function is not clarified. Methods-One hundred patients with refractory angina were randomized 1:1 to TMR (CO2 laser) and medical treatment, or medical treatment alone. Techneti um 99m (Tc-99m)-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion tomography (SPECT), quanti tative myocardial perfusion gated SPECT (QGSPECT), technetium 99m (Tc-99m) multiple gated acquisition radionuclide ventriculografi (MUGA) and cine-mag netic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) were performed at baseline and after 3 a nd 12 months. Results-Following TM:R, a slight reduction in left ventricular ejection fra ction (LVEF) (p < 0.05) was observed (MUGA and QGSPECT) compared to baselin e. Inclusion of incomplete studies (QGSPECT) revealed a significant reducti on in LVEF and increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (p < 0.05) compared to a control group. Otherwise, no between-group compariso ns showed statistically significant differences. Conclusion-TMR did not improve myocardial perfusion, but led to a reduction in LVEF and increase in LVEDV, however not significantly different from th e control group.