We argue that students' classroom resistance to the analysis of social ineq
uality and other controversial topics commonly involves their application o
f norm/other logic to course material. Such logic manifests itself as moral
ly laden dichotomies that identify the "norm" as superior to all "other" al
ternatives. Further, we argue that norm/other dichotomies exist as social c
onstructs that rely on dualism to foster a moral hegemony justifying social
inequality. However, as social constructs, norm/other dichotomies are not
immutable. Teachers may overcome students' resistance by consciously seekin
g to make students aware of this logic and its inhibiting influence on the
development of sociological understanding. We offer specific lecture topics
, in-class exercises, and homework assignments to aid teachers in helping s
tudents overcome the limitations inherent in norm/other logic.