Ms. Bogdanffy et al., Harmonization of cancer and noncancer risk assessment: Proceedings of a consensus-building workshop, TOXICOL SCI, 61(1), 2001, pp. 18-31
Significant advancements have been made toward the use of all relevant scie
ntific information in health risk assessments, This principle has been set
forth in risk-assessment guidance documents of international agencies inclu
ding those of the World Health Organization's International Programme on Ch
emical Safety, the U.S, Environmental Protection Agency, and Health Canada.
Improving the scientific basis of risk assessment is a leading strategic g
oal of the Society of Toxicology. In recent years, there has been a plethor
a of mechanistic research on modes of chemical toxicity that establishes me
chanistic links between noncancer responses to toxic agents and subsequent
overt manifestations of toxicity such as cancer. The research suggests that
differences in approaches to assessing risk of cancer and noncancer toxici
ty need to be resolved and a common broad paradigm for dose-response assess
ments developed for all toxicity endpoints. In November 1999, a workshop en
titled "Harmonization of Cancer and Noncancer Risk Assessment" was held to
discuss the most critical issues involved in developing a more consistent a
cid unified approach to risk assessment for all endpoints. Invited particip
ants from government, industry, and academia discussed focus questions in t
he areas of mode of action as the basis for harmonization, common levels of
adverse effect across toxicities for use in dose-response assessments, and
scaling and uncertainty factors. This report summarizes the results of tho
se discussions. There was broad agreement, albeit not unanimous, that curre
nt science supports the development of a harmonized set of principles that
guide risk assessments for all toxic endpoints. There was an acceptance amo
ng the participants that understanding the mode of action of a chemical is
ultimately critical for nondefault risk assessments, that common modes of a
ction for different toxicities can be defined, and that our approach to ass
essing toxicity should be biologically consistent.