G. Juric et al., The value of cell proliferation and angiogenesis in the prognostic assessment of ovarian granulosa cell tumors, TUMORI, 87(1), 2001, pp. 47-53
Objectives: Most cases of granulosa cell tumors (GCT) of the ovary are char
acterized by a relatively good outcome. However, some tumors behave aggress
ively and some tend to recur many years after the initial diagnosis. Tumor
growth depends on cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Thus, proliferative
indices and microvessel density were studied to determine possible valuable
methods to assess the GCT patient's outcome.
Methods and study design: Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were available fo
r 60 patients with primary GCT and were investigated by immunostaining with
monoclonal antibodies against PCNA, Ki-67 and factor VIII-related antigen.
The follow-up was available for 51 patients and ranged from 25 to 206 mont
hs. A clinical follow-up distribution of patients was made: 8 patients with
recurrence (group I); 6 patients who lived with no evidence of recurrence
for 100 months or more (group II), and 37 patients alive with no evidence o
f recurrence in the follow-up period of less than 100 months (group III).
Reslrlts: There was a statistical correlation between PCNA and Ki-67 prolif
erative indices. A significant increase (P <0.05) of mean PCNA and Ki-67 pr
oliferative indices and mean tumor size was seen in patients of Group I com
pared to those of Group II. The mean PCNA proliferative index positively co
rrelated with the mean Ki-67 proliferative index for Groups I and II. Mean
microvessel density showed a positive correlation with mean PCNA and Ki-67
proliferative indices and with mean tumor size for Group I, whereas it was
negatively correlated with PCNA proliferative index and tumor size for Grou
p II. A positive correlation was found between mean mitotic count and both
proliferative indices only for Group ii. The following features were indica
tive of a relatively poor prognosis: GCT measuring >9 cm in diameter, PCNA
>4.0%, Ki-67 >1.2%, and diffuse, insular and sarcomatoid histologic pattern
s.
Conclusions: The findings support the importance of proliferative factors,
tumor size and histologic patterns as possible prognostic indicators for es
timating the biologic behavior of patients with GCT. Unfortunately, angioge
nesis did not seem to be a useful determinant parameter of a possible aggre
ssive behavior. However, a longer follow-up period with larger series may b
e required to assess the value of the parameters in prediction of patient s
urvival.