This paper contrasts the implications, for cartel stability, of the no
nspatial ('Chamberlinian') and the spatial ('Hotelling') models of pro
duct differentiation. Using the special case of a linear demand framew
ork, we show that whereas the former approach suggests that cartel sta
bility is non-monotonic but predictable in the degree of differentiati
on, the outcome is very much more ambiguous when the latter formulatio
n is employed. We examine also the implications for stability when dem
and shocks occur, and show that even in the case of linear demand, whe
n differentiation is modelled in spatial terms the results are consist
ent with non-linear non-spatial demand functions, as well as with thos
e obtained in more complicated models of firm behaviour.