Concerns about finding effects that are actually spurious

Citation
Dr. Anderson et al., Concerns about finding effects that are actually spurious, WILDL SOC B, 29(1), 2001, pp. 311-316
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
311 - 316
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(200121)29:1<311:CAFETA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
During the course of data analysis one must be concerned about 1) failing t o detect real effects that are present in the data and 2) finding effects t hat seem supported by the data but are actually spurious. Our paper deals w ith the latter issue and outlines 5 scenarios in which the probability of f inding spurious effects is high. We provide some guidelines to avoid findin g and reporting effects that are spurious. It is unfortunate that there see m to be rewards but no penalties for finding and reporting on results that have a high probability of being spurious. We conclude that there is a need for more theory to guide empirical studies and warn against analysis strat egies that are especially prone to elicit spurious results.