Cognitive and learning theories were used to develop a framework in which d
ifferent knowledge representations prime recipients with different schemata
and thereby differentially affect their decision making. We evaluated inte
rpretive, general, and particular knowledge representations in a laboratory
experiment with managers. The hypotheses received mixed support, with sign
ificant results indicating the importance of particular knowledge represent
ations in managerial decision making and an intriguing role for interpretiv
e knowledge representations.