Logical models of argument formalize commonsense reasoning while taking pro
cess and computation seriously. This survey discusses the main ideas that c
haracterize different logical models of argument. It presents the formal fe
atures of a few main approaches to the modeling of argumentation.
We trace the evolution of argumentation from the mid-1980s, when argument s
ystems emerged as an alternative to nonmonotonic formalisms based on classi
cal logic, to the present, as argument is embedded in different complex sys
tems for real-world applications, and allows more formal work to be done in
different areas, such as AI and Law, case-based reasoning and negotiation
among intelligent agents.