The 1990s debate on postmodernism as a metatheoretical basis for American p
ublic administration is reviewed based on its progress over rime, Important
themes in the debates are social constructivism and anti-foundationalism;
deconstruction and narrative and linguistic analysis: pragmatism; and quant
um theory. Considerable differences exist between the participants, and str
ictly speaking, there are rather few true postmodernists, bur there is a la
rge group of theorists who share a strong skepticism for the generalizing t
ype of theory and instead recommend more situational analysis. Most of thes
e theorists are pragmatists with a strong interest in public administration
as an instrument to achieve a better society on the basis of democratic pa
rticipation.