An evaluation of factors affecting hazardous waste workers' use of respiratory protective equipment

Citation
Mk. Salazar et al., An evaluation of factors affecting hazardous waste workers' use of respiratory protective equipment, AIHAJ, 62(2), 2001, pp. 236-245
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AIHAJ
ISSN journal
15298663 → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
236 - 245
Database
ISI
SICI code
1529-8663(200103/04)62:2<236:AEOFAH>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of a group of haz ardous waste workers about their workplace hazards and to understand their beliefs and attitudes about the use of respiratory protective equipment (RP E). There were two phases of data collection: (1) interviews to identify fa ctors that influence respirator use and (2) a written survey to evaluate th e importance of these factors. This article describes the findings from the written survey completed by 255 eligible respondents (return rate = 46.5%, 255/548). Subjects used a weighting system to score 18 identified factors that influence the use of BPE. Scores were compared according to type of re spirator, frequency of use and associated health symptoms. The factors that had the most positive influence on respirator use were concern about work exposure, fit-testing, and training. The most negative influences were comm unication, personal comfort, effect on vision: structural environment, and fatigue. More frequent users (once per month or more) were significantly mo re likely to view fit-testing, health effects, and effects on vision negati vely than were less frequent users. Persons who reported health symptoms as sociated with respirator use had more negative scores than persons without health symptoms. Workers categorized as laborers were more likely to be fre quent respirator users and to wear supplied-air respirators, and were signi ficantly more likely to view vulnerability to disease negatively than were other worker groups. The findings from this study indicate that respiratory protection programs must extend beyond training and education; to be maxim ally effective, health professionals must be responsive to the specific con cerns of the workers.