Nineteen university departments and 108 non-university departments of neuro
logy participated in a survey on standards of evaluation of pain patients,
equalling a response rate of 37%. Twentyone per cent of these departments r
un a neurological outpatient pain clinic, 38% work in a multidisciplinary p
ain clinic for outpatients and 88% treat inpatients suffering from pain. A
standardised evaluation of somatic aspects of pain syndromes is effected in
22% of the departments, whereas psychic aspects are assessed in 15%. 24% o
f the departments use them for follow-up assessments mostly via locally dev
eloped questionnaires and scales. Twenty per cent of doctors consider their
evaluation tools a relevant or considerable help in diagnosing pain syndro
mes, 47% in the therapy of pain patients. Seventy per cent reported on a sa
tisfactory balance between efforts and benefits of their evaluation instrum
ents, while only 6% reported in a considerable benefit. This survey shows t
hat general acceptance of standardised and validated instruments for the ev
aluation of pain syndromes is low in German neurology. Hence, it appears ma
ndatory to explore and emphasise scientifically the advantages of such inst
ruments in daily practice via specific studies. In addition to the improvem
ent in clincial care of pain patients, high-quality documentation is necess
ary to meet the increasing demands by health policy makers and general publ
ic with regard to the transparency of medical services and also in relation
to the cost-utility analysis in this important sphere of clinical neurolog
y.