Randomized comparison between orally and transdermally administered hormone replacement therapy regimens of long-term effects on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in postmenopausal women

Citation
B. Cacciatore et al., Randomized comparison between orally and transdermally administered hormone replacement therapy regimens of long-term effects on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in postmenopausal women, AM J OBST G, 184(5), 2001, pp. 904-909
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029378 → ACNP
Volume
184
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
904 - 909
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(200104)184:5<904:RCBOAT>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether Oral delivery and tr ansdermal delivery of sequential combined hormone replacement therapy have similar effects on systemic blood pressure, as measured by 24-hour automate d ambulatory recordings. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-two healthy postmenopausal women, of whom 73 completed the study, were randomly assigned to start hormone replacement therapy wit h either orally (n = 38) or transdermally (n = 35) administered medication. Ambulatory blood pressure was recorded for a 24-hour period before the sta rt of hormone replacement therapy and again 2 and 6 months later. Analysis of variance was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Hormone replacement therapy by both oral and transdermal routes wa s associated with slight but nonsignificant drops in mean 24-hour systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure. Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure (mean +/- SE) bit significantly (P <.05) and similarly at 2 months in the oral (3.8 <plus/minus> 0.2 mm Hg) and transdermal (4.0 +/- 0.3 mm H g) treatment groups. The daytime ambulatory blood pressure remained signifi cantly lower than baseline at 6 months in the oral treatment group (-3.6 +/ -: 0.3 mm Hg), whereas the fall at 6 months in the transdermal group (-3.1 +/- 0.3 mm Hg) was not significant. Mean daytime diastolic ambulatory blood pressure was reduced in both the oral (-1.8 +/- 0.8 mm Hg) and transdermal (-3.5 +/- 0.7 mm Hg; P<.05) treatment groups at 2 months but not at 6 mont hs. Nighttime ambulatory blood pressures in both groups remained unaffected by hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: Sequential combined hormone replacement therapy delivered by bo th oral and transdermal routes caused significant falls in the daytime ambu latory blood pressure of normotensive postmenopausal women at 2 months of t reatment. This fall persisted as long as 6 months of treatment in the oral treatment group but not in the transdermal treatment group.