Objective: To examine the impact of gunshot-caused spinal cord injury on ac
ute and rehabilitative care outcome using a case control design.
Design: Two groups (i.e., gunshot- vs. nongunshot-caused spinal cord injury
) of 212 individuals were matched case-for-case on age (i.e., within 10 yr)
, education, gender, race, marital status, primary occupation, impairment l
evel, and Model System region. Outcome measures included length of hospital
stay, functional status (FIM (TM)), treatment charges, and home discharge
rates.
Results: The two groups did not differ in the length of stay during acute a
nd rehabilitative care, charges during rehabilitative care, or postrehabili
tation discharge placement. Several significant between-group differences i
n treatment procedures were noted (e.g., prevalence of spinal surgery), whi
ch may, in part, account for the higher acute-care charges among those pers
ons with nongunshot-caused spinal cord injury.
Conclusion: Once an individual is stabilized and admitted for rehabilitativ
e care, gunshot etiology of spinal cord injury seems largely unrelated to t
he initial rehabilitation outcome.