REGARDING ETHICS IN FORENSIC NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTATION - A COMMENT ON GUILMETTE AND HAGAN

Authors
Citation
Aj. Mcsweeny, REGARDING ETHICS IN FORENSIC NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTATION - A COMMENT ON GUILMETTE AND HAGAN, Clinical neuropsychologist, 11(3), 1997, pp. 291-293
Citations number
3
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical","Clinical Neurology",Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
13854046
Volume
11
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
291 - 293
Database
ISI
SICI code
1385-4046(1997)11:3<291:REIFNC>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Guilmette and Hagan present an issue that is important to neuropsychol ogists who engage in forensic practice: the applicability of the APA E thics Code to situations where neuropsychologists consult with attorne ys but do not testify or otherwise reveal their identity to opposing a ttorneys or consultants. The resulting anonymity could encourage the m isuse of neuropsychological knowledge, according to Guilmette and Haga n. A review of the APA Ethics Code reveals that deliberate use of neur opsychological knowledge to assist attorneys in misleading juries and others is clearly not consistent with the spirit or the letter of the Code. Neuropsychologists are advised to behave in a manner consistent with the Code, even when seemingly protected by a cloak of anonymity.