Ca. Greim et al., The detection of interatrial flow patency in awake and anesthetized patients: A comparative study using transnasal transesophageal echocardiography, ANESTH ANAL, 92(5), 2001, pp. 1111-1116
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The Valsalva maneuver in the awake patient and the ventilation maneuver in
the tracheally intubated anesthetized patient are two provocation methods t
o detect a patent foramen ovale (PFO) by means of contrast transesophageal
echocardiography. In 60 patients undergoing posterior fossa surgery, a cont
rast agent was administered via a peripheral vein during a Valsalva maneuve
r immediately before anesthesia induction, followed by central venous admin
istration during a ventilation maneuver in the same patients when anestheti
zed and endotracheally intubated. We evaluated both maneuvers with a 32-ele
ment monoplane transnasal transesophageal echocardiography probe to trace t
he atrial flow of the contrast agent in a 90 degrees bicaval view. A maneuv
er was rated positive when more than four bubbles appeared in the left atri
um during the first three cardiac cycles after intrathoracic pressure relea
se. The right atrial cross-sectional area before pressure release, and the
peak septal excursion during atrial contrast opacification, were measured.
McNemar's test was used to assess a paired dichotomous response on the two
maneuvers for a significant difference. In 56 patients, the ventilation man
euver was significantly (P < 0.037) more often positive for PFO (n = 14) th
an the Valsalva maneuver (n = 7). Although there was no difference in the m
ethods regarding the peak septal excursion, the mean right atrial area befo
re pressure release was significantly smaller during the ventilation maneuv
er than during the Valsalva maneuver (11.2 <plus/minus> 3.1 cm(2) vs 14.4 /- 3.3 cm(2), n = 42, P < 0.05). In the patients with a positive ventilatio
n, but a negative Valsalva maneuver, the discrepancy was even larger (10.9
<plus/minus> 4.4 cm2 vs 16.3 +/- 4.2 cm(2), n = 7, P<0.001). We conclude th
at the ventilation maneuver is superior to the Valsalva maneuver in detecti
ng PFO. Our data suggest that a peak pressure of 30 cm H2O during the venti
lation maneuver achieves a more pronounced reduction in right atrial load a
nd allows right atrial pressure to exceed left atrial pressure when intrath
oracic pressure is released.