c-erbB-2 oncoprotein overexpression identifies a subgroup of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients with poor prognosis

Citation
Ae. Pinto et al., c-erbB-2 oncoprotein overexpression identifies a subgroup of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients with poor prognosis, ANN ONCOL, 12(4), 2001, pp. 525-533
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
09237534 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
525 - 533
Database
ISI
SICI code
0923-7534(200104)12:4<525:COOIAS>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the predictive value of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expres sion as compared with established histopathological and cytometric indicato rs of disease evolution in breast carcinoma. Patients and methods: A short-term retrospective study was conducted on a s eries of 306 breast cancer patients. Classic prognostic factors included tu mour size, nodal involvement, histological grading, and hormone receptor st atus. Flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) were also asses sed. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariate statistical analysis. Results: c-erbB-2 overexpression was present in 43 out of 295 (14.6%) tumou rs, and showed a statistically significant correlation with high histologic al grade, DNA aneuploidy, high SPF and lack of estrogen receptors (ER). Uni variate analysis revealed its association with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The combined evaluation of c-erbB-2 with p loidy and SPF defines a variable (P + S + c) that showed a significant corr elation with disease outcome. By multivariate analysis, only nodal status ( P < 0.001) and P + S + c subgrouping (group 2: P = 0.002; group 3: P = 0.00 1) in relation to DFS, and nodal status (P = 0.001) and DNA ploidy (P = 0.0 06) in relation to OS, retained independent prognostic significance. Subset analyses showed that cytometric parameters, P + S + c subgrouping and horm one receptors were significantly correlated with disease outcome in node-po sitive patients, whereas in node-negative subgroup no prognostic indicators were found. c-erbB-2 overexpression exhibited a trend in node-positive bre ast cancer (DFS: P = 0.068; OS: P = 0.086), and significant correlation wit h poor clinical evolution in ER positive patients (DFS: P = 0.015; OS: P = 0.004), mostly receiving tamoxifen. Conclusions: c-erbB-2 is an independent prognostic indicator of DFS when ev aluated in conjunction with ploidy and SPF. It also seems to predict respon se to tamoxifen therapy, by identifying a subgroup of ER positive (ER+) bre ast cancer patients with poor prognosis.