Jr. Green et al., THE EFFECT OF ZOLEDRONATE AND PAMIDRONATE ON THE INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY BARRIER IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO, International journal of pharmaceutics, 153(1), 1997, pp. 59-66
The intestinal tolerability profile of the potent bisphosphonate compo
und zoledronate (CGP 42'446) has been compared with that of pamidronat
e in 2 preclinical screening models. Despite being 2-3 orders of magni
tude more potent than pamidronate as an inhibitor of bone resorption,
zoledronate (1-100 mM) was 2-4 fold less potent at disrupting the perm
eability barrier of monolayers of an intestinal epithelial cell line (
Caco-2) in vitro. In an acute in vivo rat model, luminal perfusion of
ileal loops with zoledronate, pamidronate or EDTA at a concentration o
f 30 mM disrupted the intestinal permeability barrier within 1 h where
as 1 and 10 mM solutions had no effect. Since both EDTA and bisphospho
nates are powerful calcium chelators, these changes are most probably
due to calcium sequestration and a consequent loosening of tight junct
ions between the intestinal epithelial cells rather than to a specific
pharmacological action. Thus, in comparison to pamidronate, the high
potency of zoledronate as an inhibitor of bone resorption is not assoc
iated with a corresponding increase in the compound's potential to dam
age the intestinal mucosa. From these preclinical studies, it is predi
cted that zoledronate should have a higher therapeutic ratio than pami
dronate (anti-resorptive potency in bone versus adverse intestinal eff
ects) in man. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.