The hypothesis of the exclusively genetic origin of cancer ("cancer is a di
sease of genes, a tumor without any damage to the genome does not exist") d
ominated in the oncology until recently. A considerable amount of data conf
irming this hypothesis was accumulated during the last quarter of the last
century. It was demonstrated that the accumulation of damage of specific ge
nes lies at the origin of a tumor and its following progression. The damage
gives rise to structural changes in the respective proteins and, consequen
tly, to inappropriate mitogenic stimulation of cells (activation of oncogen
es) or to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes that inhibit cell divi
sion, or to the combination of both (in most cases). According to an altern
ative (epigenetic) hypothesis that was extremely unpopular until recently,
a tumor is caused not by a gene damage, but by an inappropriate function of
genes ("cancer is a disease of gene regulation and differentiation"). Howe
ver, recent studies led to the convergence of these hypotheses that initial
ly seemed to be contradictory. It was established that both factors-genetic
and epigenetic-lie at the origin of carcinogenesis. The relative contribut
ion of each varies significantly in different human tumors. Suppressor gene
s and genes of repair are inactivated in tumors due to their damage or meth
ylation of their promoters (in the latter case an "epimutation", an epigene
tic equivalent of a mutation, occurs, producing the same functional consequ
ences). It is becoming evident that not only the mutagens, but various fact
ors influencing cell metabolism, notably methylation, should be considered
as carcinogens.