Expression of LRP and MDR1 in locally advanced breast cancer predicts axillary node invasion at the time of rescue mastectomy after induction chemotherapy
J. Schneider et al., Expression of LRP and MDR1 in locally advanced breast cancer predicts axillary node invasion at the time of rescue mastectomy after induction chemotherapy, BREAST CA R, 3(3), 2001, pp. 183-191
Background: Axillary node status after induction chemotherapy for locally a
dvanced breast cancer has been shown on multivariate analysis to be an inde
pendent predictor of relapse. However, it has been postulated that responde
rs to induction chemotherapy with a clinically negative axilla could be spa
red the burden of lymphadenectomy, because most of them will not show histo
logical nodal invasion. P-glycoprotein expression in the rescue mastectomy
specimen has finally been identified as a significant predictor of patient
survival.
Materials and methods: We studied the expression of the genes encoding mult
idrug resistance associated protein (MDR1) and lung cancer associated resis
tance protein (LRP) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from
52 patients treated for locally advanced breast cancer by means of inducti
on chemotherapy followed by rescue mastectomy. P-glycoprotein expression wa
s assessed by means of immunohistochemistry before treatment in 23 cases, a
nd by means of reverse-transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction (RT
-PCR) after treatment in 46 (6 failed). LRP expression was detected by mean
s of immunohistochemistry, with the LRP-56 monoclonal antibody, in 31 cases
before treatment. Immunohistochemistry for detecting the expression of c-e
rb-B2, p53, Ki67, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor are routinely
performed in our laboratory in every case, and the results obtained were i
ncluded in the study. All patients had received between two and six cycles
of standard 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemothe
rapy, with two exceptions [one patient received four cycles of a docetaxel-
adriamycin combination, and the other four cycles of standard cyclophospham
ide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF) polychemotherapy]. Response was asses
sed in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RE
CIST), By these, 2 patients achieved a complete clinical response, 37 a par
tial response, and the remaining 13 showed stable disease. This makes a tot
al clinical response rate of 75.0%. None achieved a complete pathological r
esponse.
Results: MDR1 mRNA expression detected by RT-PCR was associated with the pr
esence of invaded axillary nodes at surgery in 18/22 cases (81.8%), compare
d with 13/24 (54.2%) in the group with undetectable MDR1 expression. This d
ifference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). LRP expression in more
than 20% of tumor cells before any treatment was associated with axillary n
odal metastasis after chemotherapy and rescue mastectomy in 17/23 cases, co
mpared with 3/8 in nonexpressors. Again, this difference was highly signifi
cant (P< 0.01). LRP expression before treatment and MDR1 mRNA expression af
ter treatment were significantly interrelated (P< 0.001), which might refle
ct the presence of chemoresistant clones liable to metastasize to the regio
nal nodes. Persistence of previously detected MDR1-positivity after treatme
nt (7/9 compared with 0/2 cases) was significantly associated with axillary
node metastasis (P< 0.05). Finally, in a logistic regression multivariate
model, histology other than ductal, a Ki67 labeling index of at least 20% a
nd the combination of LRP and MDR1 positivity emerged as independent predic
tors of axillary node invasion at the time of rescue mastectomy.
Conclusion: The expression of different genes involved in resistance to che
motherapy, both before and after treatment with neoadjuvant, is associated
with the presence of axillary node invasion at rescue surgery in locally ad
vanced breast cancer. This might reflect the presence of intrinsically resi
stant clones before any form of therapy, which persist after it, and could
be helpful both for prognosis and for the choice of individual treatment.