Aims-To compare the efficacy and safety of famciclovir with aciclovir for t
he treatment of ophthalmic tester.
Methods-Randomised, double masked, aciclovir controlled, parallel group in
87 centres worldwide including 454 patients with ophthalmic tester of trige
minal nerve (V-1) comprised the intent to treat population. Oral famciclovi
r 500 mg three times daily or oral aciclovir 800 mg five times daily for 7
days. Assessments included day 0 (screening), days 3 and 7 (during treatmen
t), days 10, 14, 21, 28 and monthly thereafter, up to 6 months (follow up).
Proportion of patients who experienced ocular manifestations, severe manif
estations and non-severe manifestations; loss of visual acuity was the main
outcome measure.
Results-The percentage of patients who experienced one or more ocular manif
estations was similar for famciclovir (142/245, 58.0%) and aciclovir (114/1
96, 58.2%) recipients, with no significant difference between groups (OR 0.
99; 95% CI 0.68, 1.45). The percentage of patients who experienced severe a
nd non-severe manifestations was similar between groups, with no significan
t difference. The prevalence of individual ocular manifestations was compar
able between groups. There was no significant difference between groups for
visual acuity loss.
Conclusion-Famciclovir 500 mg three times daily was well tolerated and demo
nstrated efficacy similar to aciclovir 800 mg five times daily.