G. De Manzoni et al., Rhesus D-phenotype does not provide prognostic information additional to TNM staging in gastric cancer patients, CANCER DET, 25(2), 2001, pp. 161-165
Recently, the Rhesus D-negative phenotype was identified in multivariate an
alysis as an important independent risk factor in gastric cancer patients w
ho underwent curative resection. The distribution of Rhesus (Rh) D phenotyp
e was investigated in a group of 268 patients who underwent gastrectomy for
gastric cancer from June 1988 to April 1999. After excluding patients with
short, potentially guaranteed follow-up or who deceased in the postoperati
ve period, the prognostic significance of Rh D phenotype was evaluated in a
subgroup of 239 patients by Cox regression model controlling for gender, a
ge, site, histology, depth of tumor invasion (T), node metastasis (N), and
type of resection (R). Two hundred and thirty-six patients (88.1%) presente
d an Rh+ phenotype and 32 (11.9%) presented an Rh- phenotype. A significant
association was found between Rh D-phenotype and the presence of residual
tumor after surgery (P = .01). The cumulative 5-year survival rats (95% con
fidence interval) was 37.3% (18.1-56.6) in patients with Rh- phenotype and
47.0% (39.2-54.4) in patients with Rh+ phenotype. The Rh D phenotype did no
t affect survival independently either in univariate analysis (P = .27) or
in multivariate analysis (P = .55). The relative risk of death in D-negativ
e versus D-positive patients decreased from 1.36 (95% confidence interval,
0.80-2.30) in univariate analysis to 0.84 (0.47-1.49) in multivariate analy
sis after controlling for depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastases, a
nd type of resection. Our study did not confirm the prognostic significance
of Rh D phenotype in gastric cancer patients.