What is the association between the different components of stroke rehabilitation and health outcomes?

Citation
H. Alexander et al., What is the association between the different components of stroke rehabilitation and health outcomes?, CLIN REHAB, 15(2), 2001, pp. 207-215
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02692155 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
207 - 215
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2155(200104)15:2<207:WITABT>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the rehabilitation input stroke patients received f rom health professionals during the early post stroke period and to explore possible associations between health outcomes and these rehabilitation inp uts. Design: Community-based study with prospective identification of stroke pat ients from a random sample of 24 general practices stratified by geographic al area and practice size. Setting: Ayrshire and Arran Health Board area, West of Scotland. Interventions: All physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics, podiatry , speech and language therapy and community nursing inputs given to stroke patients in the course of normal treatment were recorded. Outcome measures: Barthel Index and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (S F-36). Both recorded at one, three and six months post stroke. Results: Of the 152 people providing data, more had received physiotherapy than any other rehabilitation input at all three follow-ups (81%, 47%, 39%) , with occupational therapy being the next most common service (65%, 44%, 2 5%). Amount of rehabilitation input was significantly negatively correlated with health outcomes measured at each discrete time point: those patients with the poorest outcomes received greatest input. However, regression anal ysis of change in outcome scores showed that increasing amounts of rehabili tation input were significantly associated with a reduction in disability, particularly between one and three months post stroke. Conclusions: Not only have we shown that those stroke patients with poorest outcomes received most rehabilitation input, but, from analysis of the ind ividual rehabilitation inputs, we have identified some rehabilitation input s that significantly predict improved outcomes. This suggests that there wo uld be merit in further investigation of these associations.