Long-term follow-up after ileoanal pouch procedure - Algorithm for diagnosis, classification, and management of pouchitis

Citation
Ua. Heuschen et al., Long-term follow-up after ileoanal pouch procedure - Algorithm for diagnosis, classification, and management of pouchitis, DIS COL REC, 44(4), 2001, pp. 487-499
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN journal
00123706 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
487 - 499
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(200104)44:4<487:LFAIPP>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inflammation of the ileoanal pouch (pouchitis) is one of the main complications after restorative proctocolectomy, yet its cause remains poor ly understood. A standardized definition and diagnostic procedures in pouch itis are lacking. METHOD: We analyzed all cases of pouchitis occurring in a group of 308 patients (210 with ulcerative colitis, 98 with familial adeno matous polyposis) who took part in a prospective long-term follow-up progra m. The severity of pouchitis was measured using a pouchitis activity score (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score). An algorithm for the classification and management of pouchitis was established which enables the clinician: 1) to determine the severity of pouchitis, 2) to differentiate between primar y pouchitis and pouchitis caused by surgical complications (secondary, pouc hitis), and 3) to evaluate the course (acute vs. chronic (> 3 months)). RES ULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 48 (range, 13-119) months. At le ast one episode of pouchitis was diagnosed in 29 percent of patients with u lcerative colitis and in 2 percent of familial adenomatous polyposis patien ts. Secondary pouchitis occurred in 6 percent of ulcerative colitis patient s and was cured by surgical treatment in 13 (87 percent) of 15 cases. Prima ry pouchitis was diagnosed in 23 percent of ulcerative colitis patients, in cluding 6 percent of all ulcerative colitis patients with chronic primary p ouchitis. The latter showed poor response to medical treatment. In one case multifocal high-grade dysplasia occurred. Histologic examination of the ex cised pouch identified a carcinoma originating from the ileal mucosa. CONCL USIONS: Ulcerative colitis patients after restorative proctocolectomy face a high risk of developing pouchitis. The algorithm used in this study was h ighly efficient in identifying patients with a secondary pouchitis who requ ire surgical treatment and patients with chronic primary pouchitis. For the latter, long-term surveillance seems mandatory because of the risk of mali gnant transformation of the pouch mucosa.