The author considers the politics and poetics of belief and disbelief in la
te 18th-century and early 19th-century Britain and France, with particular
reference to the mythologies and controversies about the location and natur
e of Timbuctoo, a city widely believed to be the hub of a fabulously wealth
y African trading system. Like other episodes in the history of European ex
ploration, from the quest for the North-West passage to the search for the
source of the Nile and the races to the North and South Poles, the scramble
to reach Timbuctoo was sustained by intense international rivalry and spaw
ned a widespread speculative discourse involving politicians, scientists, s
cientific patrons, explorers, and journalists. Drawing on recent work on th
e social history of truth, the author considers how and why different geogr
aphical descriptions of Timbuctoo were deemed credible by the scientific co
mmunities of London and Paris. Judgments about 'new' geographical informati
on were influenced, if not determined, by a complex and shifting rhetoric o
f adjudication in which moral assessments about the character and status of
rival claimants loomed especially large. When the French explorer Rene Cai
llie claimed the prize of the Paris Geographical Society as the first explo
rer to reach and return from Timbuctoo in 1828, his achievements sparked an
acrimonious debate between British and French geographers that raised fund
amental questions about the purpose of African exploration and the nature o
f geographical truth. Of central concern were the legitimacy of disguise as
an exploratory tactic, and the importance of physical courage and bodily c
omportment in assessing an explorer's scientific credibility and moral auth
ority.