Radiotherapy and surgery for early laryngeal cancer achieve comparably good
results in patient survival, and the choice of treatment between them is b
eing c influenced increasingly by the expected voice quality and quality of
life (QoL). The superiority of vocal function after radiotherapy has been
shown in previous objective voice assessment studies. This study compared t
he QoL, or long-term survivors after endoscopic laser surgery, or radiother
apy fur early laryngeal carcinoma. QoL was evaluated with two validated que
stionnaires: the global EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head- and neck-specific EORTC
QLQ-H&N35. A total of 62 patients were included. Among 56 patients complet
ing the questionnaires (90% completion rate) 40 were treated by endoscopic
CO2 laser surgery and 16 with radiation therapy, All 56 patients showed a g
ood global QoL with no significant difference between the two treatment mod
alities, The head- and neck-specific evaluation revealed significantly bett
er scores for surgically treated patients in questions about swallowing Of
solid food, xerostomia, and tooth problems, but no difference in questions
about voice quality. Both treatment modalities achieve goad Vol after treat
ment of early laryngeal tumors. Irradiated patients mainly complain about x
erostomia related problems. In contrast to objective measurements long-ten
survivors after surgery do not rate their voice poorer than irradiated pati
ents. The EORTC questionnaires are validated and useful tools in assessing
QoL and should further be used in prospective trials.