Obstetric litigation: Effects on clinical practice

Authors
Citation
A. Symon, Obstetric litigation: Effects on clinical practice, GYNAKOL GEB, 40(3-4), 2000, pp. 165-171
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
GYNAKOLOGISCH-GEBURTSHILFLICHE RUNDSCHAU
ISSN journal
10188843 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
165 - 171
Database
ISI
SICI code
1018-8843(200004)40:3-4<165:OLEOCP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Many claims concerning extent and consequences of litigation have been made , despite a tack of comprehensive and widely available data. It has been su ggested that a rapidly increasing rate of litigation has caused problems in the recruitment and retention of obstetricians, and has also caused practi tioners to practice 'defensively'. This article discusses meaning and signi ficance of defensiveness within obstetrics and midwifery and quantifies the incidence of certain examples of defensive practice. Based on large-scale postal surveys of obstetricians and midwives in Scotland and England, as we ll as follow-up interviews, it clarifies the significance of what has becom e known as defensive medicine in maternity care, notably in relation to cae sarean sections. It then examines the role of clinical risk management, and the growth of protocols and guidelines in particular, in trying to limit l itigation. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.